BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Medical Policy Manual

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Outpatient Setting

DESCRIPTION

Negative pressure wound therapy is intended to promote healing of acute or chronic wounds. It is used as an adjunct to or an alternative to surgery for individuals who have failed a complete wound therapy program, are debilitated and cannot have surgery, or for whom the use of such a program has been ruled out.

Negative pressure wound therapy involves either a powered or non-powered suction apparatus device:

A conventional wound therapy program consists of all the following: evaluation, care and routine wound measurements by a licensed medical professional; application of dressings to maintain a moist wound environment; debridement of necrotic tissue if present; evaluation and provision for adequate nutritional status; appropriate turning and positioning of the individual who is incapable of doing this on their own; use of a support surface for pressure ulcers on the posterior trunk or pelvis; appropriate management of moisture and incontinence; adherence to a comprehensive diabetic management program if diabetic; accomplishment of reduction in pressure on a foot ulcer with appropriate modalities; consistent application of compression bandages and/or garment for individuals with venous insufficiency ulcers; encouragement of leg elevation and ambulation for individuals with venous insufficiency ulcers.

In November 2009, the FDA issued an alert concerning complications and deaths that had been associated with negative pressure wound therapy systems.

POLICY

See also:  Hyperbaric Oxygen Pressurization / Therapy (HBO2)

MEDICAL APPROPRIATENESS

IMPORTANT REMINDER

We develop Medical Policies to provide guidance to Members and Providers. This Medical Policy relates only to the services or supplies described in it. The existence of a Medical Policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract for the service (or supply) that is referenced in the Medical Policy. For a determination of the benefits that a Member is entitled to receive under his or her health plan, the Member’s health plan must be reviewed. If there is a conflict between the Medical Policy and a health plan, the express terms of the health plan will govern.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Contraindications for the use of negative pressure wound therapy systems include the following conditions as noted by a February 2011 safety communication: necrotic tissue with eschar, untreated osteomyelitis, non-enteric and unexplored fistulas, malignancy in the wound, exposed nerve, exposed anastomotic site, and exposed organ.

Additional contraindications include but are not limited to the following: Urinary/wound infection; pneumonia; albumin less than 2.0g/dl; renal; pulmonary; or other chronic disease requiring stabilization; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; thyroid disease; or hypertension; use of systemic steroids; pregnancy or breast feeding; inability to comply with dressing changes; active bleeding; or the individual is on anticoagulation therapy; and difficult wound hemostasis.

Complete healing of a wound would normally be anticipated if all bone, cartilage, tendons, and foreign material were completely covered, healthy granulation were present to within 5 mm of the surface, and the wound edges were reduced to 2 cm in width or diameter.

The literature reviewed does not show the benefit of continuing negative pressure wound therapy for more than three (3) months, if there is a lack of improvement in the condition of the wound.

Lack of improvement of a wound is defined, as lack of progress in quantitative measurements of wound characteristics (i.e., wound length, width, or surface area, and/or depth).

Negative pressure therapy systems should be used as part of a comprehensive wound care program that includes attention to other factors that impact wound healing including but not limited to diabetes control, nutritional status, and relief of pressure.

Examples of the powered negative pressure wound therapy or suction devices cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration include, but are not limited to the following:

Manufacturer

Device

Acuro Medical Products LLC

WoundPro Apex

Atmos Medizin Technik

S041 wound

Boehringer Wound Systems LLC

Boehringer wound therapy pump

Genadyne Biotechnologies Inc.

Genadyne A4 NPWT

Genadyne AS4 XLR8 NPWT

Innovative Therapies Inc.

SVED Wound treatment unit

SVEDMAN treatment unit

SVEDMAN wound treatment unit

Kalypto Medical Inc.

NPD 1000 Negative Pressure Wound Care system

Kinetic Concepts Inc. (KCI)

Activ A.C. Therapy System

Mini V.A.C.

VAC Freedom Portable Therapy Device

V.A.C. Electrical pump (stationary and portable)

Medela Inc.

Invia Healing System

Invia Wound Therapy Invia Liberty

Invia Wound Therapy Invia Vario

Ohio Medical Corporation

Moblvac W.C.

Premco Medical Systems

Prodigy NPWT

Prospera LLC

Prospera Pro I Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Pump

Prospera Technologies

Prospera Pro-II AC/ DC

Prospera Pro III AC/ DC

Smith and Nephew Inc.

Ezcare system

Renasys EZ

Renasys Go

V1sta portable system

Versatile 1 (Blue Sky Medical Group, [Company Purchased by Smith and Nephew Inc])

Superior Healthcare Concepts Inc (DBA National Wound Care)

Closed suction would drainage system

Talley Medical USA

Venturi compact

Venturi Negative Pressure wound therapy

The lack of well-designed comparative studies with large number of individuals using the non-powered negative pressure wound therapy system is insufficient to draw conclusions about its impact on net health outcomes with the device and in comparison with current care.

SOURCES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2009 July). Negative pressure wound therapy devices. Retrieved July 23, 2010 from http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ta/negpresswtd/negpresswtd.pdf.

Armstrong, D. G., Marston, W. A., Reyzelman, A. M., & Kirsner, R. S. (2011). Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy with an ultraportable mechanically powered device vs. traditional electrically powered device for the treatment of chronic lower extremity ulcers: A multicenter randomized-controlled trial. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 19 (2), 173-180. (Level 2 Evidence - Industry sponsored)

Baharestani, M., Houliston-Otto, D., & Barnes, S. (2008). Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: Examining the impact on home care length of stay. Ostomy Wound Management, 54 (11), 48-53.

BlueCross BlueShield Association. Medical Policy Reference Manual. (4:2011). Negative pressure therapy for the treatment of chronic wounds (1.01.16). Retrieved June 14, 2011 from BlueWeb. (42 articles and/or guidelines reviewed)

BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee network physicians. May, 2000.

Blume, P., Walters, J., Payne, W., Ayala, J., & Lantis, J. (2008). Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 31 (4), 631-636. (Level 1 Evidence - Industry sponsored)

ECRI Institute. Health Technology Information Service. Emerging Technology (TARGET) Evidence Report. (2009, June). Negative-pressure wound therapy for chronic wounds. Retrieved July 23, 2010 from ECRI Institute. (19 articles and/or guidelines reviewed)

Fonder, M. A., Lazarus, G. S., Cowan, D. A., Aronson-Cook, B., Kohli, A. R., & Mamelak, A. J. (2008). Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 58 (2), 185-206.

Gregor, S., Maegele, M., Sauerland, S., Krahn, J., Peinemann, F., & Lange, S. (2008). Negative pressure wound therapy: A vacuum of evidence? Archives of Surgery, 143 (2), 189-196.

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). (2010, April). Health care protocol. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment protocol. Retrieved July 23, 2010 from http://www.icsi.org/pressure_ulcer_treatment_protocol__review_and_comment_/pressure_ulcer_treatment__protocol__.html.

Lerman, B., Olenbrook, L., Ryu, J., Fong, K. D., & Schubart, P. J. (2011). The SNaP Wound Care System: A case series using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device for the treatment of diabetic lower extremity wounds. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 4 (4), 825-830. (Level 4 Evidence - Industry sponsored)

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2009, December). Negative pressure wound therapy for the open abdomen. Retrieved July 27, 2010 from http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12102/46576/46576.pdf.

U. S. Department of Health & Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. LCDs for CIGNA Government Services. (2009, October). LCD for negative pressure wound therapy pumps (L5008). Retrieved July 23, 2010 from http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/lcd-details.aspx?LCDId=5008&ContrId=140&ver=41&ContrVer=1&CoverageSelection=Both&ArticleType=All&PolicyType=Final&s=Tennessee&KeyWord=negative+pressure+wound+therapy&KeyWordLookUp=Title&KeyWordSearchType=And&bc=gAAAABAAAAAA&.

U. S. Food and Drug Administration. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2010, November). Medical devices; general and plastic surgery devices; classification of non-powered suction apparatus device intended for negative pressure wound therapy. Federal Register, 75 (221), 70112-70114.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2008, October). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) Premarket Notification Database. K081406. Retrieved June 15, 2011 from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf8/K081406.pdf.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2008, October). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) Premarket Notification Database. K080275. Retrieved June 15, 2011 from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf8/K080275.pdf.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2011, February). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. FDA safety communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with negative pressure wound therapy systems. Retrieved June 16, 2010 from http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm244211.htm.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2011, March). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) Premarket Notification Database. K103156. Retrieved June 15, 2011 from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/K103156.pdf.

Vuerstaek, J., Vainas, T., Wuite, J., Nelemans, P., Neumann, M., & Veraart J. (2006). State-of the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 44 (5), 1029-1037. (Level 2 Evidence - Industry sponsored)

Winifred S. Hayes, Inc. Medical Technology Directory. (2007, November). Negative pressure wound therapy for wound healing. Retrieved July 23, 2010 from www.Hayesinc.com/subscribers. (81 articles and/ or guidelines reviewed)

Zelen, C. M., Stover, B., Nielson, D., & Cunningham, M. (2011). A prospective study of negative pressure wound therapy with integrated irrigation for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Eplasty, 11, e5. (Level 4 Evidence - Independent study)

ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE:  5/1998  

MOST RECENT REVIEW DATE:  11/12/2011

ID_BA

Policies included in the Medical Policy Manual are not intended to certify coverage availability. They are medical determinations about a particular technology, service, drug, etc. While a policy or technology may be medically necessary, it could be excluded in a member's benefit plan. Please check with the appropriate claims department to determine if the service in question is a covered service under a particular benefit plan. Use of the Medical Policy Manual is not intended to replace independent medical judgment for treatment of individuals. The content on this Web site is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice in any way. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider if you have questions regarding a medical condition or treatment.

This document has been classified as public information.