Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Miscellaneous Applications
DESCRIPTION
Positron emission tomography (PET) images biochemical reactions and physiological functions by measuring concentrations of radioactive chemicals that are partially metabolized in the body region of interest.
Radiopharmaceuticals used for PET are generated in a cyclotron or nuclear generator and introduced into the body by intravenous injection or by respiration. The scanners used for PET imaging are very similar to those used for x-ray computed tomography, but PET requires more complicated technology and computerized mathematical models of physiologic functions and tracer kinetics for generation of images.
POLICY
Positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of epileptic seizures is considered medically necessary if the medical appropriateness criteria are met. (See Medical Appropriateness below.)
Positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis is considered medically necessary if the medical appropriateness criteria are met. (See Medical Appropriateness below.)
Positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of other conditions / diseases, including, but not limited to, the following is considered investigational:
Autoimmune disorders with CNS manifestations, including:
Behçet's syndrome
Lupus erythematosus
Cerebrovascular diseases, including:
arterial occlusive disease (arteriosclerosis, atherosclerosis)
cerebral aneurysm
hemorrhage
ischemia
cerebrovascular malformations (AVM and Moyamoya disease)
carotid artery disease
infarct
Degenerative motor neuron disease, including:
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Friedreich's ataxia
Olivopontocerebellar atrophy
Parkinson's disease
Progressive supranuclear palsy
Spinocerebellar degeneration
Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease
Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome;
Shy-Drager syndrome
Dementias, including:
Alzheimer's disease
Pick's disease
Schizophrenia
Multi-infarct dementia
Presenile dementia
Demyelinating diseases such as:
Multiple sclerosis
Developmental, congenital or inherited disorders, including:
Adrenoleukodystrophy
Huntington's chorea
Kinky hair disease (Menkes syndrome)
Down's syndrome
Phakomatoses
Sturge-Weber syndrome (encephalofacial angiomatosis)
Miscellaneous
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Sick building syndrome
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Nutritional or metabolic disease and disorders, including:
Acanthocytes
Hepatic encephalopathy
Hepatolenticular degeneration
Metachromatic leukodystrophy
Mitochondrial disease
Subacute necrotizing encephalomyelopathy
Psychiatric disease and disorders, including:
Affective disorders
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Schizophrenia
Depression
Psychomotor disorders
Pyogenic infections, including:
Aspergillosis
Encephalitis
Substance abuse, including:
CNS effects of alcohol, cocaine and heroin
Trauma, including:
Brain injury
Carbon monoxide poisoning
Viral infections, including:
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)
AIDS dementia complex
Creutzfeldt-Jacob syndrome
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
Progressive rubella encephalopathy
Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis
Migraine
Anorexia nervosa
Cerebral blood flow in newborns
Vegetative versus "locked-in" state
Pulmonary Diseases
Adult respiratory distress syndrome
Diffuse panbronchiolitis
Emphysema
Obstructive lung disease
Pneumonia
Musculoskeletal diseases
Spondylodiscitis
Joint replacement follow-up
Other
Giant cell arteritis
See also:
Milliman Care Guideline - PET, Myocardial
MEDICAL APPROPRIATENESS
Positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of epileptic seizures is considered medically appropriate for ALL of the following:
Complex partial seizures that have failed to respond to medical therapy and have been advised to have a resection of a suspected epileptogenic focus located in a region of the brain accessible to surgery
Conventional techniques for seizure localization must have been tried and provided data that suggested a seizure focus, but were not sufficiently conclusive to permit surgery
Positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of chronic osteomyelitis is considered medically appropriate when conventional diagnostic testing is inconclusive.
IMPORTANT REMINDER
We develop Medical Policies to provide guidance to Members and Providers. This Medical Policy relates only to the services or supplies described in it. The existence of a Medical Policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract for the service (or supply) that is referenced in the Medical Policy. For a determination of the benefits that a Member is entitled to receive under his or her health plan, the Member's health plan must be reviewed. If there is a conflict between the Medical Policy and a health plan, the express terms of the health plan will govern.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
No evidence was found to show that evaluation of positron emission tomography for miscellaneous indications considered investigational could predict clinical events and improve individual outcomes.
SOURCES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2003, May). Evidence report/ technology assessment No. 57: Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review of the literature (DHHS AHRQ Publication No. 03-E039). Retrieved November 1, 2005 from http://www.ahrq.gov.
BlueCross Blue Shield Association. Medical Policy Reference Manual. (2:2007). Miscellaneous applications of positron emission tomography (PET) (6.01.06). Retrieved December 15, 2008 from BlueWeb.
Complete Guide to Medicare Coverage Issues [Computer software]. (2008, November). Positron emission tomography (PET) scans (NCD 220.6, p.2-166-2-180).The Ingenix Complete Guide to Medicare Coverage Issues.
Goetz, C. G. (Ed.). (2003). Goetz: Textbook of Clinical Neurology (2 nd ed., pp. 458-461). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
Griggs, R. C. (2000). Neurology: Evaluation of the patient. L. Goldman & J. C. Bennett (Eds.), Goldman: Cecil Textbook of Medicine (21st ed., pp. 2017-2023). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Health Technology Assessment Information Service. Target database. (2004, June). Positron emission tomography (PET) for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Retrieved October 27, 2005 from ECRI HTAIS.
Kantarci, K., & Jack, C. R. (2003). Neuroimaging in Alzheimer disease: An evidence-based review. Neuroimaging Clinic of North America, 13 (2), 197-209. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Kaplan, H. I., & Saddock, B. (Eds.). (1995) Kaplan: Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (6th ed., pp. 2277-2288). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Kelley, R. E., & Minagar, A. (2004). Memory complaints and dementia. Primary Care Clinic in Office Practice, 31 (1), 129-148. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Knopman, D. S., DeKosky, S.T., Cummings, J. L., Chui, H., Corey-Bloom, J., Relkin, N., et al. (2001). Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Neurology, 56 (9), 1143-1153. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Kuhl, D. E., Koeppe, R. A., Minoshima, S., Snyder, S. E., Ficaro, E. P., Foster, N. L., et al. (1999). In vivo mapping of cerebral acetylcholinesterase activity in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 52 (4), 691-699. Abstract retrieved March 7, 2000 from PubMed database.
Kumar, S., Rajshekher, G., & Prabhakar, S. (2005). Positron emission tomography in neurological diseases. Neurology India, 53 (2), 149-155. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Mosconi, L., Tsui, W. H., DeSanti, S., Li, J., Rusinek, H., Convit, A., et al. (2005). Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD: Automated FDG-PET image analysis. Neurology, 64 (11), 1860-1867. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Newberg, A. B., & Alavi, A. (2005). The role of PET imaging in the management of patients with central nervous system disorders. Radiologic Clinics of North America 43 (1), 49-65. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Nordberg, A. (2004). PET imaging of amyloid in Alzheimer's disease. The Lancet Neurology, 3 (9), 519-527. Abstract retrieved November 9, 2004 from PubMed database.
Otsuka, M., Kuwabara, Y., Ichiya, Y., Hosokawa, S., Sasaki, M., Yoshida, T., et al. (1997). Differentiating between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease by positron emission tomography with 18F-dopa and 18F-FDG. Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 11 (3), 251-257. Abstract retrieved March 30, 2000 from PubMed database.
Rakshi, J. S., Uema, T., Ito, K., Bailey, D. L., Morrish, P. K., Ashburner, J., et al. (1999). Frontal, midbrain, and striatal dopaminergic function in early and advanced Parkinson's disease: A 3D [(18)F] dopa-PET study. Brain, 122 (9), 1637-1650. Abstract retrieved March 30, 2000 from PubMed database.
Silverman, D. H., & Alavi, A. (2005). PET imaging in the assessment of normal and impaired cognitive function. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 43 (1), 67-77. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
The Technology Evaluation Center. (1996, April). PET, SPECT, or MRS in the differential diagnosis of dementias (Vol. 10, No. 29). Chicago: BlueCross BlueShield Association.
The Technology Evaluation Center. (1997, March). PET or SPECT in the management of seizure disorders (Vol. 11, No. 33). Chicago: BlueCross BlueShield Association.
Tuchman, R. (2003). Autism. Neurologic Clinics of North America, 21 (4), 915-932. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
Weitemeyer, L., Kellinghaus, C., Weckesser, M., Matheja, P., Loddenkemper, T., Schuierer, G, et.al. (2005). The prognostic value of [F] FDG-PET in nonrefractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia, 46 (10), 1654-1660. Abstract retrieved November 1, 2005 from PubMed database.
ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/1992
MOST RECENT REVIEW DATE: 5/9/2009
ID_BT
Policies included in the Medical Policy Manual are not intended to certify coverage availability. They are medical determinations about a particular technology, service, drug, etc. While a policy or technology may be medically necessary, it could be excluded in a member's benefit plan. Please check with the appropriate claims department to determine if the service in question is a covered service under a particular benefit plan. Use of the Medical Policy Manual is not intended to replace independent medical judgment for treatment of individuals. The content on this Web site is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice in any way. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider if you have questions regarding a medical condition or treatment.
This document has been classified as public information.